communiqués | législation | statistiques | publications | renseignements | commentaires | autres sites | recherche | Ministre


{short description of image}

Reaffirming the Mission of Our Schools

A NEW DIRECTION FOR SUCCESS

Report of the Task Force
on Curriculum Reform


Contents

A Word from the Chair

Acknowledgments

CHAPTER 1

CURRICULUM REFORM

1. CURRICULUM REFORM IN WESTERN COUNTRIES
1.1 Underlying Reasons for Curriculum Reform
1.2 Characteristics of Current Curriculum Reforms
2. CURRICULUM REFORM IN QUÉBEC
2.1 The Origins of the Current Curriculum
2.2 Early Criticism
2.3 The Work and Opinions of the Conseil Supérieur de l’Éducation
2.4 Recent Government Statements Concerning Curriculum Reform
2.5 The Opinions of the Commission for the Estates General on Education
2.6

Conclusion

CHAPTER 2

EXPECTATIONS TO BE MET THROUGH THE CURRICULUM REFORM

1. EXPECTATIONS RELATING TO THE MISSION OF INSTRUCTION
1.1 Focusing on the Mission of Instruction
1.2 Raising Standards
1.3 Improving Cultural Content
1.4 Taking Lifelong Learning into Account
1.5 Adapting the Curriculum to Social Changes
1.6 Ensuring That General Skills Are Mastered
2. EXPECTATIONS RELATING TO THE MISSION OF SOCIALIZATION
2.1 The Quest for Meaning
2.2 Common Values Based on Common Goals
2.3 The History of Québec
2.4 The Question of Language
2.5 Social Exclusion and Segregation in Schools
3. EXPECTATIONS RELATING TO THE MISSION OF PROVIDING QUALIFICATIONS
4. EXPECTATIONS RELATING TO THE USE OF TIME
4.1 Giving True Meaning to the Cycles
4.2 Making Maximum Use of the Time Available
4.3 Challenging the Dominant Model for Organizing School Time
5. EXPECTATIONS RELATING TO THE USE OF LEEWAY AND AUTONOMY
5.1 Providing Leeway
5.2 Recovering and Preserving a Degree of Professional Autonomy for Teachers
6.

EXPECTATIONS RELATING TO EVALUATION AND CERTIFICATION

CHAPTER 3

OVERALL CURRICULUM CONTENT

1. LEARNING PROFILES, EXIT PROFILES AND OVERALL CURRICULUM CONTENT
2. MAJOR AREAS OF LEARNING, ESSENTIAL LEARNING AND ELEMENTARY OR PRIMARY KNOWLEDGE
3. ESSENTIAL LEARNING IN THE BROAD FIELDS OR DISCIPLINES
3.1 Languages
3.2 Technology, Science and Mathematics
3.3 Life in Society
3.4 The Arts
3.5 Personal Development
4.

ESSENTIAL LEARNING ACROSS THE CURRICULUM

CHAPTER 4

SUBJECTS RETAINED IN THE CURRICULUM AND SUBJECT-TIME ALLOCATION

1. PROPOSED CHANGES
2. SUBJECT-TIME ALLOCATION
2.1 A Common Core
2.2 Subject-Time Allocation at the Elementary Level
2.3 Subject-Time Allocation in the First Cycle of Secondary School
2.4

Subject-Time Allocation in the Second Cycle of Secondary School 

CHAPTER 5

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAMS

1. THE PRESENT SITUATION
1.1 Who Establishes the Programs?
1.2 Who Develops the Programs?
1.3 How Are the Programs Presented?
2. PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PROGRAM ESTABLISHMENT PROCESS
2.1 Program Presentation Formats
2.2 The Supervisory, Coordination and Control Mechanisms
2.3

The Role of Teachers

CHAPTER 6

EVALUATION AND CERTIFICATION

1. THE PLACE OF EVALUATION IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM
2. PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION IN THE FIELD OF EVALUATION
2.1 Summary of Progress
2.2 Changes in the Nature and Form of the Measurement Instruments Used
2.3 The Special Case of the Language of Instruction
2.4 The Report Card
3. THE CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDIES
3.1 The First Cycle of Secondary School
3.2 The End of Secondary School
3.3 Corrections to Certain Certification Practices
4. CREATION OF A PROVINCIAL MECHANISM FOR THE EVALUATION OF STUDENT LEARNING
4.1 Québec: A Tradition
4.2 For the Creation of a Provincial Mechanism
5.

UPDATING OF THE MINISTERIAL POLICY ON EVALUATION

CHAPTER 7

CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTING THE PROPOSED CURRICULUM REFORM

1. UPDATING AND REVISION OF THE PROGRAMS OF STUDY
2. TENTATIVE CALENDAR
2.1 Report
2.2 Basic School Regulations
2.3 Education Act
2.4 Calendar for the Elementary Level
2.5 Calendar for the Secondary Level
3. IMPACT ON TEACHING STAFF
3.1 Impact on Positions
3.2 Impact on Initial Teacher Training
3.3 Impact on Professional Development
4. IMPACT ON WORK ORGANIZATION IN SCHOOLS
5. REALLOCATION OF CERTAIN RESOURCES
6.

IMPACT ON SCHOOLS

Groupe de travail sur la réforme du curriculum

June 16, 1997

The Honourable Pauline Marois
Minister of Education
Gouvernement du Québec
1035, rue De La Chevrotière, 16e étage
Québec (Québec) G1R 5A5

Dear Madam Minister:

We are honoured to table our report, in accordance with the mandate you gave our Task Force on January 30, 1997.

In our mandate, you requested that we table, in June 1997, our recommendations “concerning the changes to be made to the elementary and secondary school curricula in order to satisfy the demands of the 21st century” and specified the points on which proposals for change were expected. We believe this report fully complies with your request.

Two concerns were constantly on our minds throughout the discussions and proceedings which led to the formulation of these recommendations. Our first concern was to provide a better quality education to QuŽbecÕs children and youth. Their intellectual and personal development hinges on our attaining this goal: with a better education, they will be better prepared to face the challenges ahead.

Our second concern was to address the calls for adjustments to the curriculum voiced by individuals, groups and organizations over the last ten years and more particularly during the hearings and sessions held as a part of the Estates General on Education. We feel that we have provided a satisfactory response to these demands. In some instances, the proposals we have made even imply substantial revisions to current practices.

It is with great pleasure that we submit a unanimous report.

Sincerely,

signature.GIF (5323 bytes)

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

When we agreed to sit on this Task Force, we knew, although we could not measure the scope of the challenge ahead of us, that we would be part of a tremendous team effort. Now that we have completed our mandate, we realize just how much our success depended on the support and expertise of our numerous collaborators.

Our work benefited from the advice and opinions of the many individuals and groups we consulted, who did not hesitate to answer our call. We wish to thank them sincerely for finding the time to work with us, and for sharing their knowledge and experience. These individuals and groups are named on the next page.

I would also like to express my appreciation of the exceptional contribution made by certain staff members of the ministère de l’Éducation: Francine Richard, who saw to the smooth running of the Task Force’s activities, drafted the minutes of our meetings, and was a great help in putting this report together; André Martin, whose knowledge of the history of education in Québec over the last 30 years was indispensable to us and whose analysis shed new light on many points; Jean Hénaire, who versed us in learning across the curriculum and in citizenship education; Johanne Forest, who, with tireless patience and perseverance, typed the various versions of this report and took care of a great many of our small problems, all with the greatest courtesy; and finally Paul Vachon, who, while he sat on this Task Force, also coordinated the work of these individuals and maintained close ties with the senior levels and other branches of the ministère de l'Éducation.

Without the collaboration of all of these individuals, we could not have tabled these proposals to "reaffirm the mission of our schools."

Paul Inchauspé

 

TASK FORCE ON CURRICULUM REFORM

Groups and Individuals Consulted and Contributors


Ministère de l’Éducation

  • The officers in charge of program development
  • The officers in charge of the evaluation of student learning
  • The staff of the Direction de la formation et de la titularisation du personnel scolaire
  • The staff of the Direction des relations de travail
  • The management team of the Direction générale de la formation professionnelle et technique
  • The team in charge of new technologies (Direction des ressources didactiques)
  • The staff of the Direction des services aux anglophones
  • The officer in charge of the committee on continuing education
  • The officer in charge of the working group on the preschool education program
  • The officer in charge of the working group on the intercultural education policy
  • Luce Brossard, editor of the periodical Vie pédagogique
  • Arthur Marsolais, of the Conseil supérieur de l’éducation

Conseil Supérieur de l’Éducation

  • The members of the Catholic Committee
  • The members of the Protestant Committee

Other Ministries and Organizations

  • Ministère de la Culture et des Communications (André Couture and Fabienne Bilodeau)
  • Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (Donald Brisson and Diane Rodier)
  • A group of students and professors in the Faculty of Education, Université du Québec en Abitibi-
    Témiscamingue
  • Conseil pédagogique interdisciplinaire
  • A group of social studies education consultants from the Laval-Laurentides-Lanaudière region
  • Regroupement de responsables pédagogiques d’écoles privées
  • Advisory Board on English Education (Gretta Chambers)
  • School principals with the Commission des écoles catholiques de Sherbrooke (Charlotte Sansot,
    école du Soleil Levant and Mario Duclos, école du Boisjoli)
  • School principals in the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region
  • Service régional d’admission de Montréal (Jean-Pierre Bergeron, executive director)
  • Janyne Hodder, principal, Bishop’s University
 
© Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport | © Équipe de réalisation
1035, rue De La Chevrotière, Québec, Québec, G1R 5A5

© Gouvernement du Québec, 2007